Over Inflated

Comments

What's their take on copyright? Bet they keep it.

It will be interesting to see how much they pay for this - I suspect it will run into pence. Pence you probably can't claim until it has reached an unlikely sum...

'Helium' is an interesting name - it conjures images of balloons drifting off into the outer stratosphere and pissed people with high-pitched voices. What message are they giving? Are their promises of untold wealth merely thinner than the air we breathe?

I liked the article though - you've provided me with some useful tips, now all I need is to cultivate an interest in golf and bag myself a royal caddie.

I had no idea you were a golf expert Subid. Could you please advise me whether to shout "For!", "Four!" "4!" or "Fore!" when I'm next on the golf course? I'd hate to get it wrong and look silly in front of my adult human big nosed caddy.

You Is Money - "By submitting your content to Helium, you agree to the following:
• You grant Helium, and its affiliates, a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, transferable, non-exclusive right and license to use, copy, modify, delete in its entirety, adapt, publish, translate, display, create derivative works from and/or sell and/or distribute content posted to Helium."
So you might make 25p from the article, whilst they sell it on to publications worldwide. Cool.

Jangly - when I read other people's articles, I imagine them narrating in that same squeaky voice.

Norahdamus - it is actually "phorr!". Boy, have I saved you a red face? You're welcome.

My favourite piece of info up there is the bit about enraged flamingos eye-pecking .

Inspired.

That's the only bit that's true.
[this is good]

OK, so they're just ripping off their writers then. Nothing new in online content, particularly in the last five years.

I wish people wouldn't write for them, but no, they seem to think it will bring them some kind of kudos or help them build up a portfolio. I never write for free if the publisher is making money, and I never had to when I was starting out - that's just a myth and it allows the exploitation to continue.

*grumble grumble* Sorry, got a bit carried away there.

Your blog makes my day!

Pennywise - I joined up yesterday, and copy and pasted an old article I wrote when first testing it and finding out how it worked; before I'd read the tee and cees. Then I had a good poke around, and published the one above. What I now find is that you cannot delete articles. There is a limited editing function called 'Leapfrogging' (no prizes for plain English there); so I altered my original lengthy article to say simply "You can't delete articles? Oops". However, when I submitted this, it told me that the edit is pending approval. My money (the one cent I have earned so far) is on lack of approval.

Li'lemy - thanks! You reading it makes mine.

Update
My 'Leapfrog' was rejected, quelle surprise.
Cunts.

I am trying not to become addicted, but it's tough going. There are some real gems. My favourite at the moment is possibly Shyla Martin, whose passion is "being funny".

Her review on the 'Borat' movie, in its entirety:
I will not watch this film. It is nothing but juvenile humor, and I will not to sink to that level.

I hope she got paid more than a measly one cent for that. But that's not a patch on 'A response to 'Why atheism is wrong'':
I have met many people claiming to be atheists. I have read books and essays written by atheists. I have even heard their stories on television. Everyone of them had one thing in common. No, it wasn't their belief that there was no God. In fact, most of them said the words, "I don't want to believe in a God that..." Not wanting to believe in something isn't the same as disbelieving. Atheists simply don't want to be held accountable for their actions.

Ha! There's one in the you filthy responsibility-shirking unbelievers!

I beg you not to read Shyla's "drunk diary". It's put me right off my brunch.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in